← Back to context Comment by skilled 7 months ago Not sure what you are getting at. Care to elaborate?Google wouldn’t exist without websites to index. 5 comments skilled Reply tgv 7 months ago In that logic, someone removing their websites robs Google of content. blueflow 7 months ago Its not robbery if you never had the rights to it? You misused that word. skilled 7 months ago What would be a better word, given the context? blueflow 7 months ago maybe "loss of income for content creators"? 1 reply →
blueflow 7 months ago Its not robbery if you never had the rights to it? You misused that word. skilled 7 months ago What would be a better word, given the context? blueflow 7 months ago maybe "loss of income for content creators"? 1 reply →
skilled 7 months ago What would be a better word, given the context? blueflow 7 months ago maybe "loss of income for content creators"? 1 reply →
In that logic, someone removing their websites robs Google of content.
Its not robbery if you never had the rights to it? You misused that word.
What would be a better word, given the context?
maybe "loss of income for content creators"?
1 reply →