Comment by fragmede
7 months ago
We get it, you're skeptical of the current hype bubble. But that's one helluva no true Scotsman you've got going on there. Because a true builder, one that deeply loves building things wouldn't want to use text to create an image. Anyone who does is a business type or an executive producer. A true builder wouldn't think about what they want to do in such nasty thing as words. Creation comes from the soul, which we all know machines, and business people, don't have.
Using English, instead of C, to get a computer to do something doesn't turn you into a beaurocrat any more than using Python or Javascript instead does.
Only a person that truly loves building things, far deeper than you'll ever know, someone that's never programmed in a compiled language, would get that.
Getting drunk off that AI kool-aid aren't ya
the othering of creators because they use a different paintbrush was bothering me.
I can relate, AI is a tool, and if I want to write my code by LEGOing a bunch of AI-generated functions together, I should be able to.
please go other yourself somewhere else
1 reply →
> Using English, instead of C, to get a computer to do something doesn't turn you into a beaurocrat any more than using Python or Javascript instead does.
If one uses English in as precise a way as one crafts code, sure.
Most people do not (cannot?) use English that precisely.
There's little technical difference between using English and using code to create...
... but there is a huge difference on the other side of the keyboard, as lots of people know English, including people who aren't used to fully thinking through a problem and tackling all the corner cases.
> Most people do not (cannot?) use English that precisely.
No one can, which is why any place human interaction needs anything anywhere close to the determinancy of code, normal natural langauge is abandoned for domain-specific constructed languages built from pieces of natural language with meanings crafted especially for the particular domain as the interface language between the people (and often formalized domain-specific human-to-human communication protocols with specs as detailed as you’d see from the IETF.)
I gotta say, I love how you use english to perfectly demonstrate how imprecise english is without pre-understood context to disambiguate meaning.
using English has been tried many times in the history computing; Cobol, SQL, just to name a very few.
Still needed domain experts back then, and, IMHO, in years/decades to come
Or you can draw pretty pictures in LabVIEW lol
Was it intentional to reply with another no true Scotsman in turn here?
Yeah, I was also reading their response and was confused. "Creation comes from the soul, which we all know machines, and business people, don't have" ... "far deeper than you'll ever know", I mean, come on.
If you have to ask, then you missed it