← Back to context

Comment by cxr

2 years ago

> My reaction when I first heard of the concept of a "wiki" where everyone is allowed to edit some post (curiously before I heard about Wikipedia): I thought such a system would immediately be ruined

There are people who think that today, despite well-known existence proofs we have to the contrary.

I mean a lot of internet places have been destroyed by vandalism and upkeep costs, what were seeing us just survivorship bias and survival of the fittest.

  • In other words, existence proofs that such systems won't automatically be ruined.

    • I'd disagree, they require a massive amount of moderation and clean up to keep running. The default state is ruined and only by herculean effort is it usable by others.

      It's like a park in a high drug use area. Quite often they are ruined, and only by massive expenditure of effort are is it even near safe.

      1 reply →