Comment by worik

> I am saying that Rust development has a lower velocity than mainstream GC'ed languages (Java, C#, Go, whatever).

It depends what you measure

For software that must get it right Rust can be more productive. The early cycles of development are slow, especially for people who have not surrendered to the borrow checker, yet. But the lack of simple mistakes, or more accurately the compiler's early detection of simple mistakes dramatically speeds up development

But in a lot of software those mistakes, whilst important, will not "crash the aeroplane ", so it is not worth that extra cost in the early cycles

I am not a game developer, or player, but games are in that category I think