The thing with Netflix is that they have such few open roles and there are plenty of other liquid high comp companies that pay similar. It was all about the original stock growth that just stuck I guess
Even better, why don’t we just get rid of the unwieldy acronyms altogether and simply refer to them as “major tech companies”? It’s clearer and avoids the constant reshuffling every time the market shifts.
Why is Netflix still included? They should be kicked out, I haven’t heard anything tech about the, for years now.
Then we can go with Meta Apple Google Amazon, or MAGA for short. Ok, not a good look that one.
Because they still pay $500k cash.
The thing with Netflix is that they have such few open roles and there are plenty of other liquid high comp companies that pay similar. It was all about the original stock growth that just stuck I guess
3 replies →
What does "cash" mean in this context, as opposed to if the word wasn't included?
1 reply →
Because that's how you get FAAG
Now it's MAAMA (Microsoft, Apple, Amazon, Meta, Alphabeth)
_ is for Alphabet
then why not MAAANG?. Much better acronym, but then I just say big N.
We can still call Alphabet Google, just like everyone calls X Twitter. Clunky rebrands don't have to be accepted by everyone.
Edit: Personally I'm in favor of sorting by present market cap, so it's MANGAM.
4 replies →
Even better, why don’t we just get rid of the unwieldy acronyms altogether and simply refer to them as “major tech companies”? It’s clearer and avoids the constant reshuffling every time the market shifts.
1 reply →
Can’t we just stick with FANG?
Sure, the acronym doesn’t mean anything anymore, but at least everyone knows what it means.
5 replies →