← Back to context

Comment by krainboltgreene

1 year ago

This isn't correct and I am extremely concerned if this is the level of logic running billions of dollars.

Then please go ahead and explain how something can solve novel logical puzzles (i.e. ones that are not present in its training set) without some capacity for reasoning. You're claiming that it is "generating texts that looks like ..." - so what is the "..." in this case? I posit that the word that should be placed there is solution, and then you need to explain why that is not ipso facto a demonstration of the ability to reason.