Comment by Havoc
2 years ago
> it's that particularly breathy, chatty, voice that she performed for the movie.
Good luck proving that in court.
“You’re honor our evidence is that the audio clips both sound breathy”
2 years ago
> it's that particularly breathy, chatty, voice that she performed for the movie.
Good luck proving that in court.
“You’re honor our evidence is that the audio clips both sound breathy”
That and repeated, rejected attempts to hire ScarJo to do the voice. I expect they have ample documentation on that.
Did you not read the article? They did the voice months before that.
Then why did they ask her two days prior launch? A potential jury would be very, very curious knowing that.
5 replies →
I may be wrong, but I believe this case would be made to a jury, not to a judge.
I think it would be hard to seat a jury that, after laying out the facts about the attempts to hire Johansen, and the tweet at the time of release, would have even one person credulous enough to be convinced this was all an honest mix-up.
Which is why it will never in a million years go to a trial.