Comment by tptacek
2 years ago
The Washington Post comprehensively refuted the story. This is like the "this is good for Bitcoin because ____" meme, but in reverse.
2 years ago
The Washington Post comprehensively refuted the story. This is like the "this is good for Bitcoin because ____" meme, but in reverse.
They literally didn't question any of OAI's claims. They just regurgitated them.
They were desperate for a non-union-only actor in their casting. But repeatedly kept hitting up a union actor.
What fears for the actress' safety have been portrayed such that not only does she needs to stay anonymous, but her agent does too?
"Altman was not involved"... yet he personally reached out to SJ to try to close the deal?
They refuted it based on select documents handed to them by OpenAI.