Comment by curious_cat_163

A paragraph ends with:

> This could arguably be seen as a violation of the Cloudflare TOS, as they wrote above.

And the very next paragraph begins with:

> In any case, we receive >95% of our traffic through the main domain that’s been unchanged since our founding, and were happy to resolve this issue in whatever way...

And then they complain about paying up?

The only issue I see here is around the aggressiveness on the CF side. But, I was not in those meetings and the way above reads tells me that I might have been slightly mad so perhaps the CF was just taking it out on them?

Anyway. I don't think this is a CF foul.