← Back to context

Comment by geraldwhen

2 years ago

I find it humorous that 鷹 was described as a difficult character in the article. It’s like 3 radicals and the character for bird.

Perhaps it’s difficult to render in tiny Latin alphabet font, but if you have any Japanese or Chinese study under you, you could read and reproduce that nearly instantly on sight.

i think he meant difficult in the sense that it consists of many strokes, not in the sense how difficult it is to remember. however, one could argue that there are many other, more complex to write, kanji than 鷹