Then I think they should submit the email (e.g. in a pastebin or Google doc or something). Not misrepresent the contents of this page.
First, editorializing the submission titles is against HN policies. Second, it'd let us see the actual communication from Vercel rather than a paraphrase.
And it's not so much about proof, it's about the details. For example the $300/month discount for a much longer transition period seems like pretty relevant context.
Then I think they should submit the email (e.g. in a pastebin or Google doc or something). Not misrepresent the contents of this page.
First, editorializing the submission titles is against HN policies. Second, it'd let us see the actual communication from Vercel rather than a paraphrase.
It's fair to ask for proof. I checked Twitter and there's another user who posted a screenshot of their email. https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40683874
Thanks!
And it's not so much about proof, it's about the details. For example the $300/month discount for a much longer transition period seems like pretty relevant context.
Agreed: this would have been better as a Tell HN: [same headline] with the text of the email. See my posting history for other examples.