Comment by iandanforth
1 year ago
One point not covered but clearly understood tacitly by the author is that the representativeness of a fact degrades over time. While it may be true that someone did something 10 years ago, that fact may not be a true reflection of their character today. Thus a statement may be technically true, but practically false, and thus should be considered defamatory (under the modern American definition).
I like this notion (that any ancient past actions must carry facts of subsequent actions) better than trying to push a "right to be forgotten."