← Back to context

Comment by whimsicalism

2 years ago

> This only makes sense if OpenAI just doesn't believe AGI is a near-term-enough possibility to merit their laser focus right now

I know people who work there. Right or wrong, I promise you this is not what they believe.

Part of it I think is because the definition that openai has over AGI is much more generous than what I think most people probably imagine for ai. I believe on their website it once said something like agi is defined as a system that is "better" than a human at the economic tasks its used for. Its a definition so broad that a $1 4 function calculator would meet it because it can do arithmetic faster and more accurately than most any human. Another part is that we don't understand how consciousness works in our species or others very well, so we can't even define metrics to target for validating we have made an agi in the definition that I think most laypeople would use for it.