Comment by Kapto

1. Opinions are involuntary. You see rain, you don't decide to think it's raining. You just think it.

2. The piece doesn't say rep is property, just like property in 2 ways (no others).

3. Not wrong to damage stuff you have a strong interest in, only stuff that's also an "aspect of yourself," how the paper defines this. Doesn't apply to Taylor case.

Agree, too long and wordy. But still worth getting right what it says before hating on/disagreeing because of what it doesn't.