true. extremely boring. a bare html would looks so much better. this one is not utilitarian and is not aesthetic either. it hits the intersection between banality, uglyness and lacks of function - because it is structured like a brochure, wasting a lot of space on stock photos.
Also, where is the actual ladybug? It's not in the logo.
FWIW it's ladybird, not ladybug :)
They are the same thing. The former is more common in the UK, the latter in the US.
It's both, but bug makes more sense.
true. extremely boring. a bare html would looks so much better. this one is not utilitarian and is not aesthetic either. it hits the intersection between banality, uglyness and lacks of function - because it is structured like a brochure, wasting a lot of space on stock photos.