← Back to context

Comment by snvzz

8 months ago

Was KHTML not GPL?

How is MIT any worse at preventing this, when GPL didn't?

A: "Hey the measures we took weren't enough to prevent the abuse?"

B: "Ah I see that means we should just give up all measures, instead of you know advocating for stronger measures or anything else obvious and logical like that."

This only means we must start any projects today with stronger GPL or similar variants such as AGPL.

Better analogy.

You had a security breach, despite using a better set of technologies and techniques.

During the postmortem, you suggest this means we should give up all security or just use the weaker solution, since its all the same, the server would have gotten breached in either case.

Instead of advocating for building a stronger security.