← Back to context Comment by ArtixFox 8 months ago How does that matter?? 9 comments ArtixFox Reply llama_drama 8 months ago Check out this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40862781. While it's certainly possible to write the same parallel algorithm in C++, it wasn't done in Firefox before Rust, nor has it been done in Chrome. ArtixFox 8 months ago thats nice! in my first comment I did say that both are good for performance. I just find the idea of performance being irrelevant to be...ridiculous. thro1 8 months ago If you can not do something it's performance of what exactly ? (of nothing, or ads) 6 replies →
llama_drama 8 months ago Check out this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40862781. While it's certainly possible to write the same parallel algorithm in C++, it wasn't done in Firefox before Rust, nor has it been done in Chrome. ArtixFox 8 months ago thats nice! in my first comment I did say that both are good for performance. I just find the idea of performance being irrelevant to be...ridiculous. thro1 8 months ago If you can not do something it's performance of what exactly ? (of nothing, or ads) 6 replies →
ArtixFox 8 months ago thats nice! in my first comment I did say that both are good for performance. I just find the idea of performance being irrelevant to be...ridiculous. thro1 8 months ago If you can not do something it's performance of what exactly ? (of nothing, or ads) 6 replies →
thro1 8 months ago If you can not do something it's performance of what exactly ? (of nothing, or ads) 6 replies →
Check out this comment: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40862781. While it's certainly possible to write the same parallel algorithm in C++, it wasn't done in Firefox before Rust, nor has it been done in Chrome.
thats nice! in my first comment I did say that both are good for performance. I just find the idea of performance being irrelevant to be...ridiculous.
If you can not do something it's performance of what exactly ? (of nothing, or ads)
6 replies →