Comment by intended

Yes?

To expand on the point using your analogy -

Your point is that there would be some things an expert would see, and then judge to be highly improbable.

While this point can inform our thinking, it is the lesser point that exists within a bigger issue:

First - This is a court of law, not the court of public opinion, or processes. There is an expectation of exactness, and of a fair, unbiased and attentive hearing of the facts.

Second- While I don’t know what a triple axel is, I have seen people who seem utterly out of shape dance with grace, and people who appear to be incredibly fit, turn out to be frauds.

In this scenario, I would say that the assumption that each case is similar, is not valid.

I will grant that it becomes human to behave this way though.