Yes. Character.ai usage is way down from the peak and it is only getting easier for startups to compete in the space. However, the plausibility of an actual FAANG acquisition is almost zero, so this is the next best option… at least for certain stakeholders. Microsoft did this with Inflection.
These two stories are hard to rectify unless the Google licensing deal is a lump sum of several billion dollars. Which feels borderline impossible. Even Microsoft didn’t do that with open AI and the AI trade is cooking very fast.
Yes. Character.ai usage is way down from the peak and it is only getting easier for startups to compete in the space. However, the plausibility of an actual FAANG acquisition is almost zero, so this is the next best option… at least for certain stakeholders. Microsoft did this with Inflection.
What was the peak? I see estimated 211 million visits in June 2024, vs 86 million in Feb 2023.
Out of curiosity, where can one find reliable estimates?
Visits is an entirely meaningless metric
1 reply →
This almost seems exactly it, just as the last paragraph of the TechCrunch article hints at.
And screw investors
per The Information -- investors don't get screwed, the board repurchased all shares at $88/share ($2.5B valuation).
The money to repurchase shares must be coming from an external source?
I assumed Character.AI wasn’t profitable, like most AI startups.
1 reply →
These two stories are hard to rectify unless the Google licensing deal is a lump sum of several billion dollars. Which feels borderline impossible. Even Microsoft didn’t do that with open AI and the AI trade is cooking very fast.
1 reply →