Comment by top_sigrid
1 year ago
If you question something like public transportation being climate friendly as being scietific sound, maybe you should bring up some evidence or data to back this up.
Also some anecdote about how buses where used at some major event does not allow any conclusions to be drawn about public transportation in general.
Also "there is a lot of marketing and money involved - especially in green energy" is a rather general polemic statement, which could also some clarification.
These commenters exist (usually as bots) simply to sow a false narrative for political reasons - the views they extoll are not based on measurement or research. When active as bots, they present a idea of discord and doubt - this is a common tactic to give the appearance of the matter not being long-settled. It's also not uncommon for them to cite an unsourced anecdote which other than being irrelevant, most likely never even existed.
Rather telling is that the same user had also commented twice nearly simultaneously. These types of replies are typical for comments that mention climate or government spending.