Comment by quotemstr
1 year ago
It doesn't work that way. Any ability to ban "fake news" immediately becomes a vehicle for banning inconvenient news. It's part of human nature. I don't have to list the dozens recent examples of "fake" news turning out to be true. There's a reason that Orwell's censorship body was called the "ministry of truth".
Governments shouldn't touch censorship for the same reason alcoholics shouldn't touch booze.
Except it already does. Post CSAM or the latest Disney movie and see how long that lasts.
It's a series of bytes, just like your comment. Don't forget, money by corporations qualifies as speech.
There should be a line drawn in the sand. When it is crossed, something should happen to preserve the well-being of everybody