← Back to context

Comment by anigbrowl

1 year ago

It was not 'panned by pretty much every major legal figure'. And yes I read the whole opinion as well as the dissents.

The immunity is for official duties in his role as president, which doesn't include those examples.

  • And Sotomayor correctly pointed out that it's trivially easy to assert that any given action was an official duty, thereby gaining the benefit of presumptive immunity pending a court's detailed determination.