← Back to context

Comment by Filligree

2 years ago

But it isn't. Turquoise is turquoise, and since that wasn't an option, I picked one at random.

The whole point is demarcating the line between where colors seem more-blue-than-green, and more-green-than-blue.

  • That wasn't clearly part of the test. To be ultra-pedantic (this is HN after all), the user's choices don't say "This is more-blue-than-green" and "This is more-green-than-blue". The choices are only "This is green" and "This is blue" forcing you to just pick one, where there is no clearly correct choice. When the color on the screen is neither green nor blue, many people will just pick a random answer.

    I bet if the choices actually said "This is more green than blue" the results would be different.

    • > When the color on the screen is neither green nor blue, many people will just pick a random answer.

      Or people will naturally intuit that they should choose whichever answer they think is closer to true.

      12 replies →

  • Turqoise doesn't feel either more-green-than-blue or more-blue-than-green. It feels neither blue nor green, and I don't see any way to compare it to either.

    It's clearly more turqoise than blue. Or green.

    Turqoise on a computer monitor is always missing part of itself, so maybe I should've answered based on that, but I don't think the computer monitor was the point.

  • It’s not a line though, it’s a range where you can see it either way, like a flipping Necker cube.