← Back to context Comment by yarg 2 years ago Refer to structural isomorphism above. 3 comments yarg Reply lazide 2 years ago That’s just hand waving away all the interesting details so you can claim everything is the same though? yarg 2 years ago No, which you would've noticed if you were actually bothering to consider the other side of the argument and not simply dismissing it out of hand.Anyway, I can't be bothered with this anymore since I've completely lost the ability to assume good faith on your behalf. lazide 2 years ago [flagged]
lazide 2 years ago That’s just hand waving away all the interesting details so you can claim everything is the same though? yarg 2 years ago No, which you would've noticed if you were actually bothering to consider the other side of the argument and not simply dismissing it out of hand.Anyway, I can't be bothered with this anymore since I've completely lost the ability to assume good faith on your behalf. lazide 2 years ago [flagged]
yarg 2 years ago No, which you would've noticed if you were actually bothering to consider the other side of the argument and not simply dismissing it out of hand.Anyway, I can't be bothered with this anymore since I've completely lost the ability to assume good faith on your behalf. lazide 2 years ago [flagged]
That’s just hand waving away all the interesting details so you can claim everything is the same though?
No, which you would've noticed if you were actually bothering to consider the other side of the argument and not simply dismissing it out of hand.
Anyway, I can't be bothered with this anymore since I've completely lost the ability to assume good faith on your behalf.
[flagged]