← Back to context Comment by cryptonym 1 year ago So... Pave shouldn't exists as "Glassdoor exists" and is already providing data? 2 comments cryptonym Reply fastball 1 year ago Eh? Glassdoor is for the other party, which you were implying was being kept in the dark. cryptonym 1 year ago If Glassdoor data are sufficient, why would employers pay for Pave?It's not like Glassdoor is restricted to employees, they even offer specific services to employers.
fastball 1 year ago Eh? Glassdoor is for the other party, which you were implying was being kept in the dark. cryptonym 1 year ago If Glassdoor data are sufficient, why would employers pay for Pave?It's not like Glassdoor is restricted to employees, they even offer specific services to employers.
cryptonym 1 year ago If Glassdoor data are sufficient, why would employers pay for Pave?It's not like Glassdoor is restricted to employees, they even offer specific services to employers.
Eh? Glassdoor is for the other party, which you were implying was being kept in the dark.
If Glassdoor data are sufficient, why would employers pay for Pave?
It's not like Glassdoor is restricted to employees, they even offer specific services to employers.