← Back to context

Comment by mlyle

1 year ago

Starting off by making an obviously hamfisted move matters. It's a headwind to overcome.

Is it possible to overcome? Sure.

Yes, you can heal after shooting yourself in the foot.

(And, of course, removing attribution is violating licenses). However, they're unlikely to face litigation for this. The possible legal consequences aren't the actual consequences they're likely to face.

I can all but promise you these "headwinds" that they are facing in terms of negative PR are in fact a net positive. At their stage, any press is good press.

AFAICT, the attribution's been there since the beginning on their GitHub? (see: About section)[1].

I agree adding their own license was hamfisted, but honestly, if I'm funding a company I hope they would spend less than <$1 on legal and licensing initially. The first order of business is almost always proving whether your business should even exist.

https://github.com/trypear/pearai-app?tab=readme-ov-file

  • I mean, whatever floats your boat, but if I'm funding a company, I hope they've spent whatever they need to spend to determine whether or not what they're doing is legal and sensible, even if that involves spending more than $1.

    Cloning an open source project and having Chat-GPT write you an enterprise license is not how you "prove whether your business should even exist." It's how you scam rich people into giving you money.