Comment by andyjohnson0
6 months ago
From the policy document:
"ccTLD eligibility is determined by the associated country or territory being assigned in the ISO 3166-1 standard."
So how does a country code get removed from the ISO 3166-1 list? A cursory web search wasn't very revealing.
That's a very good question. I don't know; does any other HN'er?
The most information I can find is that the standard is maintained by the ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency [1]. Additions appear to be mostly at the direction of the United Nations [2], but I couldn't find a clear procedure as to how a country code is removed. I'm also unclear on who makes the decision to mark codes as exceptionally reserved.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166#ISO_3166_Maintenance_...
[2] https://www.iso.org/iso-3166-country-codes.html
Perhaps the operative question is how did IO get into the ISO 3166 in the first place? My guess would be as part of the UK defensively creating the illusion of it being a legitimate territory.
It was in the original 1974 standard [1]. No real idea on the politics of the time, but Britain had "paid" Mauritius £3 million for the islands less than ten years before [2], and of course the US base on Diego Garcia was already established.
I use the scare quotes because Mauritius was a British colony at the time, and so the offer was quite possibly one that the Mauritians couldn't refuse. That, and the fact that £50m (in today's money) seems ridiculously cheap.
[1] https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/2448/e41694ad96e34e95b...
[2] https://www.biot.gov.io/about/history/
The ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency makes the changes to ISO 3166. They follow notifications from and include members from these other bodies:
https://www.iso.org/iso-3166-country-codes.html
You're right these agencies make changes... but they don't decide if a country gets a ccTLD or not. They take their cue from the UN's Country Names bulletin, which in turn requires the country to be member state of the UN, or a member of one of its agencies, or a party to the Statute of the International Court of Justice
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_3166-1#Criteria_for_inclus...
Since the list was originally developed for post, there's precedent for far-flung regions of a country to have their own codes, even when they're not considered politically separate. French Guiana, for example, is considered fully part of France, and yet it has its own code (GF).
The Chagos Archipelago is a good distance from the rest of Mauritius, and so it may perhaps retain a separate registration on the ISO list.
ISO 3166-1 is maintained by the ISO 3166 Maintenance Agency which has members from agencies like ANSI, BSI, DIN, …. No way are they going to just let .io simply go out of existence. It's more like that Mauritius will attain ownership and then manage it similarly to other 'gTLDs'.
.co, .tv, and .me are ccTLDs not gTLDs. They're the ISO 3166 codes for those countries.
Some English-speaking people may treat them as global and not linked to countries, but they're not. The difference with .io is that BIOT was never a country and soon won't exist - whereas those countries have existed and will continue [1] to exist.
[1] quite possibly with the unfortunate exception of Tuvalu
That’s why I put gTLD in quotes.
> .co is owned by Columbia
aka https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colombia
(not the NYC school, or the TV network)