← Back to context Comment by fhdsgbbcaA 2 years ago We really need a [preprint] flag for unreviewed papers. 2 comments fhdsgbbcaA Reply lgessler 2 years ago IMHO reviews are almost indistinguishable from noise at the AI conferences I'm familiar with these days anyway, so I don't see much of a value add. fhdsgbbcaA 2 years ago Sad state of affairs, people are incentivized to get more papers and citations at all costs, and quality be damned.An AI Winter is not a great an idea, but an AI Autumn may be beneficial.Just have no major AI conferences for ‘25, perhaps only accept really high tier literature reviews.
lgessler 2 years ago IMHO reviews are almost indistinguishable from noise at the AI conferences I'm familiar with these days anyway, so I don't see much of a value add. fhdsgbbcaA 2 years ago Sad state of affairs, people are incentivized to get more papers and citations at all costs, and quality be damned.An AI Winter is not a great an idea, but an AI Autumn may be beneficial.Just have no major AI conferences for ‘25, perhaps only accept really high tier literature reviews.
fhdsgbbcaA 2 years ago Sad state of affairs, people are incentivized to get more papers and citations at all costs, and quality be damned.An AI Winter is not a great an idea, but an AI Autumn may be beneficial.Just have no major AI conferences for ‘25, perhaps only accept really high tier literature reviews.
IMHO reviews are almost indistinguishable from noise at the AI conferences I'm familiar with these days anyway, so I don't see much of a value add.
Sad state of affairs, people are incentivized to get more papers and citations at all costs, and quality be damned.
An AI Winter is not a great an idea, but an AI Autumn may be beneficial.
Just have no major AI conferences for ‘25, perhaps only accept really high tier literature reviews.