← Back to context

Comment by jvanderbot

6 months ago

S&R has always been a front for weaponized robotics, IMHO.

The last DARPA grand challenge (Subterrainean) had automated drone networks that could find and identify humans in caves and tunnels. They were at least up front about the military challenges in these environments. (https://www.darpa.mil/program/darpa-subterranean-challenge), but the nod at civilian first-responders doesn't seem fair. Honestly, is cave-in such a big civilian problem that we need to prioritize it as a talking point at all levels?

> Honestly, is cave-in such a big civilian problem that we need to prioritize it as a talking point at all levels?

Considering (1) the number of people who are employed in mining occupations, (2) the frequency of serious accidents in mines, yes. Particularly in developed countries, societies expect that great lengths will be gone to rescue or recover the victims, and mine rescue is incredibly dangerous work.

(1) BLS says ~200K in the US in 2024, although only a minority of them work underground.

(2) BLS says "underground mining machine operators" is the 9th deadliest job in the US, and that is with a large and well-equipped mine rescue system (MSRA says 250 teams across the country).

  • Are the other 8 BLS most dangerous professions being heavily automated and augmented with robots?

    Roofers, fishing and hunting workers, construction "helpers", etc?

    There's a case to be made that some of them are, I guess.

    • Mining is heavily mechanized and automated already, yet remains inescapably dangerous.

      Pragmatically speaking, when someone falls off a roof or a tree, it doesn't turn into a highly public, high-risk, government-responsibility rescue mission. When someone gets trapped in a mine, it does.

      (If you fall off a tree logging in Alaska, there is a good chance a USCG helicopter crew comes to your aid, but that is more of a "five minutes in the local news" story than "nightly news host reporting live on location" event.)

      1 reply →

It's generally hard to say what's a "front" for what, unless you mean "what can you get someone to grant you research money for when you really expect to parlay the learnings into another topic."

Everything about the rocketry needed to get to orbit started from warfare purposes, for example. And ARPANET was a foray into how to build a disruption-resistant network for military purposes.

Science and knowledge are a bit of a soup.