← Back to context Comment by NeonNautilus 2 years ago Can anyone else prove this security vulnerability actually existed? 7 comments NeonNautilus Reply mirzap 2 years ago It doesn't matter. Matt didn't have the right to hijack ACF. jnwatson 2 years ago I'm not on Matt's side, but anyone has the right to fork a GPL project and call it something else. mirzap 2 years ago This is not a fork. He stole the original project plugin space, its reviews, download statistics, SEO traffic, etc. It has nothing to do with GPL. 1 reply → ImPostingOnHN 2 years ago That isn't what happened here. 1 reply → DanielLestrange 2 years ago There is no proof, see my comment above.
mirzap 2 years ago It doesn't matter. Matt didn't have the right to hijack ACF. jnwatson 2 years ago I'm not on Matt's side, but anyone has the right to fork a GPL project and call it something else. mirzap 2 years ago This is not a fork. He stole the original project plugin space, its reviews, download statistics, SEO traffic, etc. It has nothing to do with GPL. 1 reply → ImPostingOnHN 2 years ago That isn't what happened here. 1 reply →
jnwatson 2 years ago I'm not on Matt's side, but anyone has the right to fork a GPL project and call it something else. mirzap 2 years ago This is not a fork. He stole the original project plugin space, its reviews, download statistics, SEO traffic, etc. It has nothing to do with GPL. 1 reply → ImPostingOnHN 2 years ago That isn't what happened here. 1 reply →
mirzap 2 years ago This is not a fork. He stole the original project plugin space, its reviews, download statistics, SEO traffic, etc. It has nothing to do with GPL. 1 reply →
It doesn't matter. Matt didn't have the right to hijack ACF.
I'm not on Matt's side, but anyone has the right to fork a GPL project and call it something else.
This is not a fork. He stole the original project plugin space, its reviews, download statistics, SEO traffic, etc. It has nothing to do with GPL.
1 reply →
That isn't what happened here.
1 reply →
There is no proof, see my comment above.