Comment by stouset

2 years ago

I am (or was, at this point) a cryptographer.

Throwing random cryptography buzzwords at a problem does not magically create a secure solution.

Even if you had a genie to give you all of this, you’d absolutely want to include and build upon the work Apple is doing here.

1 comment

stouset

Jerrrrrrry 2 years ago

  >Throwing random cryptography buzzwords at a problem does not magically create a secure solution.

no but any more words between those naughty ones and im pushing my quota

  Diffie Hellman,

TIFU, handshake, auth between two+ parties

  Homomorphic encryption, zero knowledge proofs,

Doesnt publicly exist in a useful manner; any implementations likely will be ITAR'd or NIST'd moled. allows verifiable, but anonymous computation, trust-less computing,

  decentralized triple (sender, messenger, receiver) layered protocol.

like tor/i2p/other "pony express" decentralized trustless transport protocols - pass on what you cannot decrypt.

  Faraday caged, deafened power supply, Heartbeat/pulse sensors, proximity sensors, voltage sensors, EM/radio triggers, dead-man switch, all reporting with constantly rotating codes.

^forgot to add bluetooth / orientation / volume kill-switches for physical security.

  >Even if you had a genie to give you all of this,

lets not joke the culture, they are the best at math

  >you’d absolutely want to include and build upon the work Apple is doing here.

ive described a modern da vinci codex and you think itd be better in a safe to be reverse-engineered.