← Back to context Comment by anthk 2 years ago Today OPUS is on par of AAC if not better. We aren't at the MP3/OGG times. 3 comments anthk Reply daneel_w 2 years ago Opus is better at same bitrate - not by much, but all the same it has the upper hand. anthk 2 years ago >not by muchYou are deluded, then. Or deaf. Most MP3 podcasts at 128 KBPS sound worse than an OPUS file @64. daneel_w 2 years ago I'm neither deaf nor deluded. You're not reading me correctly. I'm saying that Opus is better than AAC, but not by much. Compared to MP3 it's a lot better.
daneel_w 2 years ago Opus is better at same bitrate - not by much, but all the same it has the upper hand. anthk 2 years ago >not by muchYou are deluded, then. Or deaf. Most MP3 podcasts at 128 KBPS sound worse than an OPUS file @64. daneel_w 2 years ago I'm neither deaf nor deluded. You're not reading me correctly. I'm saying that Opus is better than AAC, but not by much. Compared to MP3 it's a lot better.
anthk 2 years ago >not by muchYou are deluded, then. Or deaf. Most MP3 podcasts at 128 KBPS sound worse than an OPUS file @64. daneel_w 2 years ago I'm neither deaf nor deluded. You're not reading me correctly. I'm saying that Opus is better than AAC, but not by much. Compared to MP3 it's a lot better.
daneel_w 2 years ago I'm neither deaf nor deluded. You're not reading me correctly. I'm saying that Opus is better than AAC, but not by much. Compared to MP3 it's a lot better.
Opus is better at same bitrate - not by much, but all the same it has the upper hand.
>not by much
You are deluded, then. Or deaf. Most MP3 podcasts at 128 KBPS sound worse than an OPUS file @64.
I'm neither deaf nor deluded. You're not reading me correctly. I'm saying that Opus is better than AAC, but not by much. Compared to MP3 it's a lot better.