Comment by tolerance

Yeah, and in spite of that comment people are trying to offer a line of discussion that is in conformity to the guidelines you cited.

But it looks like you're more interested in policing the discussion according to guidelines than engaging in the discussion after people get hip to your policing.

At this point, I'm doubtful if you even tried to read the article that we're talking about because this exchange is starting to feel like a dramatic meta-demonstration of the subject matter (defensive communication) and the community's response to the subject matter (the editor's perceived ignorance of how their changes contribute to defensive behaviors) and I don't think that you are primed to appreciate the success of this achievement.