← Back to context

Comment by bityard

6 days ago

In the most chaotic alternate reality possible: Mozilla

Having it owned by a non-profit foundation would make a huge amount of sense, especially if that foundation was then immediately funded by a variety of companies rather than just one big advertising company.

The obvious test for whether the browser is actually independent: what is the response to "let's add an ad-blocker by default".

  • > Having it owned by a non-profit foundation would make a huge amount of sense,...

    OpenAI joined the chat...

    • There would be few incentives to try and pull off something like that if nobody had any faith in the product every becoming extremely profitable though.

  • This is wishful thinking. Non-profits that don’t turn into for-profit turn into a shitshow of incompetence instead.

    • You all need to learn about employer owned companies, in Brasil it's called cooperativas not sure in english, and that would fix that

In that same alternate reality: WPEngine is given control of Automattic/WordPress as a result of the lawsuits.

  • Firefox is sponsored primary by Google. WPEngine is not. It would be like Automattic giving control to Wordpress foundation.

    • My intention was to emphasize the irony, not so much the relationship between them. :)

With Mozilla becoming so hostile to their power users in recent years (or any user who just wants to customize the interface or core functionality), I'm not sure it would make much difference.

  • They'll do what their benefactor (Goog) wants whether they own chrome or not.