← Back to context

Comment by Dalewyn

6 days ago

The most obvious example is malvertising.

Chrome is pushing ManifestV3 with extreme prejudice and Youtube pushes ever more malvertising by the day. Why can Google do this?

Because there is no competition.

> The most obvious example is malvertising. Chrome is pushing ManifestV3 with extreme prejudice and Youtube pushes ever more malvertising by the day. Why can Google do this? Because there is no competition.

Malvertising? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malvertising

Also, have you missed how terrible e.g. Edge is for user privacy? It's trying hard as heck to compete, and even playing dirty to get there. What happened to competition making things better?

  • I'm reading this in Firefox.

    • > I'm reading this in Firefox.

      There are so many things I could say in response to this, and at the risk of getting off topic: is it your belief that if you put the average user (not you, but the average user) in front of a default install of all the major browsers and had them use the browsers for a while on completely unaffiliated websites, they would find Firefox better than the others based on its merits?

      Even as a privacy-conscious techie (and former Firefox user) who has repeatedly tried to switch back, I've found Firefox to be objectively worse in general, regardless of the website.

  • >Malvertising?

    Yes, malvertising. There is no such thing as non-malicious advertising in this day and age.

    >Also, have you missed how terrible e.g. Edge is for user privacy?

    I mean, Edge is Chrome.

    The only saving grace is that it all goes to Microsoft instead of Google, which probably isn't as damaging because if you're using Edge you're probably using Windows already anyway.