← Back to context

Comment by eru

6 days ago

Thanks. The summary seems to be: Google is a big player in many markets, but not a monopoly.

You mentioned some as 'monopolies'. Let's go through them:

Browsers: as far as I can tell, the other browsers that 'are Chrome' are Chromium at most. Eg Microsoft is surely capable of forking Chromium, if Google does anything untoward.

Video streaming: I hear TikTok and Instagram and Netflix etc are popular for streaming videos, too? People also seem to be getting a lot of videos via telegram channels? (I don't know the exact numbers here. So I can't say anything definite.)

Web search: Google used to be really dominant, but they are arguably on a downward trend without any government interference: more and more people are using the likes of ChatGPT to fill the same niche in their lives.

> Why the hell should Google not be split and cut apart nine ways to Sunday?

Presumably because there's a presumption of non-interference in the markets? The same reason the government doesn't just lock you and me up for no good reason, or confiscates our property.

> Google is a big player in many markets, but not a monopoly.

Yes. The EU "dominant position" terminology is better because otherwise someone will do an "well achscually" about it being a 90% market position or whatever. In practical terms, you can assume "monopoly" is used as "too big" or "too dominant" not, "sole player". It's best to just accept it.

>Thanks. The summary seems to be: Google is a big player in many markets, but not a monopoly.

And the combination thereof is an unholy abomination.

Namely the unholy trinity of Browser + Malvertising + Search. Nothing can compete against Google so long as that trinity stands, and it protects all the other mono/duopolies from incursions with impunity.

  • The likes of ChatGPT are giving Google serious concerns over their search business.

    In any case, it's easy to switch to an alternative search engine. Users seems to like Google Search enough to stick with it.