← Back to context Comment by legobmw99 2 days ago Is there a technical reason to now allow closures as the integrand? 2 comments legobmw99 Reply n_plus_1_acc 2 days ago Mayve because they aren't guaranteed to be actual functions (in the mathematical sense) and could return random values legobmw99 2 days ago The Fn trait could be used, which prevents mutation, but allows a lot of useful closures. I should note, a motivated user could provide a junk function no matter what the type accepted is
n_plus_1_acc 2 days ago Mayve because they aren't guaranteed to be actual functions (in the mathematical sense) and could return random values legobmw99 2 days ago The Fn trait could be used, which prevents mutation, but allows a lot of useful closures. I should note, a motivated user could provide a junk function no matter what the type accepted is
legobmw99 2 days ago The Fn trait could be used, which prevents mutation, but allows a lot of useful closures. I should note, a motivated user could provide a junk function no matter what the type accepted is
Mayve because they aren't guaranteed to be actual functions (in the mathematical sense) and could return random values
The Fn trait could be used, which prevents mutation, but allows a lot of useful closures. I should note, a motivated user could provide a junk function no matter what the type accepted is