← Back to context Comment by ori_b 2 days ago How can you tell? 7 comments ori_b Reply sbarre 1 day ago I mean, based on the claims and the benchmarks, it seems to provide massive speedups to a very popular tool.How would you define "quality" in this context? echoangle 1 day ago High quality code isn't just code that performs well when executed, but also is readable, understandable and maintainable. You can't judge code quality by looking at the compiled result, just because it works well. sbarre 1 day ago That's certainly one opinion about it.One could also say that quality is related to the functional output. 3 replies → ori_b 1 day ago Written so that it's easy to maintain, well tested, correct in its handling of edge cases, easy to debug, and easy to iterate on.
sbarre 1 day ago I mean, based on the claims and the benchmarks, it seems to provide massive speedups to a very popular tool.How would you define "quality" in this context? echoangle 1 day ago High quality code isn't just code that performs well when executed, but also is readable, understandable and maintainable. You can't judge code quality by looking at the compiled result, just because it works well. sbarre 1 day ago That's certainly one opinion about it.One could also say that quality is related to the functional output. 3 replies → ori_b 1 day ago Written so that it's easy to maintain, well tested, correct in its handling of edge cases, easy to debug, and easy to iterate on.
echoangle 1 day ago High quality code isn't just code that performs well when executed, but also is readable, understandable and maintainable. You can't judge code quality by looking at the compiled result, just because it works well. sbarre 1 day ago That's certainly one opinion about it.One could also say that quality is related to the functional output. 3 replies →
sbarre 1 day ago That's certainly one opinion about it.One could also say that quality is related to the functional output. 3 replies →
ori_b 1 day ago Written so that it's easy to maintain, well tested, correct in its handling of edge cases, easy to debug, and easy to iterate on.
I mean, based on the claims and the benchmarks, it seems to provide massive speedups to a very popular tool.
How would you define "quality" in this context?
High quality code isn't just code that performs well when executed, but also is readable, understandable and maintainable. You can't judge code quality by looking at the compiled result, just because it works well.
That's certainly one opinion about it.
One could also say that quality is related to the functional output.
3 replies →
Written so that it's easy to maintain, well tested, correct in its handling of edge cases, easy to debug, and easy to iterate on.