Comment by Dylan16807
21 hours ago
"True" here is not a boolean, it's the truth of the matter.
The claim is that coordination is decreasing. Calling that "false" might mean coordination is steady. Calling it the "opposite of true" means that coordination is increasing.
That's a possible interpretation but the verbosity of the original statement hinders understanding the actual intent which is I why I recommended simplifying and removing unnecessary redundancies.
It's 40 words and makes three separate points in those words. I don't think it's too verbose, and I don't think your suggestion helps.
Everyone is entitled to their opinions.