← Back to context

Comment by cassianoleal

11 hours ago

There should be a rule whereby charities are required to have a large percentage of their jobs given to the class they're trying to help.

This could help make the size and number of said charities to be self-regulating with the problem they're trying to solve. They will grow in number whilst the problem is large, but as it subsides they naturally go down. All at the same time giving those people who are in need, money that would be otherwise given to people who don't necessarily need it from that source.

No there shouldn’t, because then e.g. charities providing help to seriously ill cancer patients won’t be able to employ anyone.

Edit: I’m not against charities doing this where it makes sense. I wouldn’t want it to be more red tape they had to struggle with though.

Have you worked for a charity? You want the government to regulate them in a nonsense way so that they close up shop? Sure, there might be a few people that can be employed to help but to pick an arbitrary percentage picked by a prepresentative body whose never talked to them ? you dont’ employ the blind to lead the blind, you hire an eye doctor