I think the idea is that then other people can easily see the absence of a sticker, and then confidently intervene, a "safe" social objection, enforcing an unambiguous rule.
There's no weird guessing whether someone is really recording at the moment, no lengthy observation or excuses or negotiated results, it's a clear requirement with an immediate action.
P.S.: Come to think of it, masking requirements are similar: It doesn't matter if you "feel fine" or "it's just the sniffles" or "hayfever", you visibly wear a respiratory mask in this place, period. Too many people have abused that trust before and it's difficult/impossible to determine personalized exceptions.
Are there still places that require masks?? I don't know of any here.
I do actually have hayfever and wearing a mask all summer is not an option for other b medical reasons so I would avoid those but I have seen any in Europe.
At this moment it's much more likely to be found in a hospital/clinic context as opposed to a coffee-shop. It can also vary based on months there's a known surge of a particular disease, i.e. influenza.
> People violating the rule will be "politely asked to stop", says Abbott. "If you are seen doing it again, you will be asked to leave the venue."
I'm past my clubbing days but can attest to seeing this in practice at a couple venues. Someone started filming one of their friends and both got promptly escorted to the door.
It's possible yes. You can also take the phone out of the case. I do this sometimes when i need to scan a QR or something.
It doesn't stop people from doing it deliberately but it prevents the discussion between people holding up a phone and someone else thinking they're being filmed. If someone does that without the sticker it is immediately cause for calling security.
I think the idea is that then other people can easily see the absence of a sticker, and then confidently intervene, a "safe" social objection, enforcing an unambiguous rule.
There's no weird guessing whether someone is really recording at the moment, no lengthy observation or excuses or negotiated results, it's a clear requirement with an immediate action.
P.S.: Come to think of it, masking requirements are similar: It doesn't matter if you "feel fine" or "it's just the sniffles" or "hayfever", you visibly wear a respiratory mask in this place, period. Too many people have abused that trust before and it's difficult/impossible to determine personalized exceptions.
Are there still places that require masks?? I don't know of any here.
I do actually have hayfever and wearing a mask all summer is not an option for other b medical reasons so I would avoid those but I have seen any in Europe.
At this moment it's much more likely to be found in a hospital/clinic context as opposed to a coffee-shop. It can also vary based on months there's a known surge of a particular disease, i.e. influenza.
From the article.
> People violating the rule will be "politely asked to stop", says Abbott. "If you are seen doing it again, you will be asked to leave the venue."
I'm past my clubbing days but can attest to seeing this in practice at a couple venues. Someone started filming one of their friends and both got promptly escorted to the door.
Reminds me of
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1L3eeC2lJZs
It's possible yes. You can also take the phone out of the case. I do this sometimes when i need to scan a QR or something.
It doesn't stop people from doing it deliberately but it prevents the discussion between people holding up a phone and someone else thinking they're being filmed. If someone does that without the sticker it is immediately cause for calling security.