← Back to context

Comment by hahahacorn

1 month ago

I don't think you're trying to understand what I'm saying, e.g. > 3. Ignore relevant information from said article I didn't ignore the relevant information from said article. I read the article, but some of the technical details are beyond my current knowledge. > make an uninformed decision What uninformed decision are you talking about?

I don't think I need to specify that by uninformed decision I mean evaluating the security risk of the feature. I think I criticized too harshly, and you're (understandably) not engaging with me fairly in retaliation. If you actually want to engage with me and discuss this further, feel free to shoot me an email (in my about section). Otherwise, obligatory https://www.paulgraham.com/vb.html.

> I don't think you're trying to understand what I'm saying

I'm trying, but obviously I'm failing.

> I don't think I need to specify that by uninformed decision I mean evaluating the security risk of the feature.

For the third time, that wasn't what I was trying to do with the blog post.

> you're (understandably) not engaging with me fairly in retaliation

I don't think you're understanding me either. I'm not retaliating. I was trying to clarify.