Comment by CamperBob2
17 days ago
Looking more closely at the image, it seems that the strikeouts are what are confusing the model. It sees "Henry" and disregards "James" written above it. In a few places, the strikeouts almost look more like underlining.
Gotta be an insanely-challenging task for a program that wasn't even written with handwriting recognition in mind.
Other than the proper names, are any major details wrong?
Dr. Jang said: "I've not transcribed this work yet it's future work. I can send it once it's transcribed, however from skimming the various chatgpt texts you sent me, the people are generally wrong, their relationships are inconsistent between all the text you sent me, these issues are why I do not go to chatgpt to help me with my research. The document generally is indeed about requesting the courts oversee the apprenticeship work. Minors could work, however, when minors are used it needed to be overseen by the courts, this document is the court overseeing the work"
She provided this as one she just got done working with: https://s.h4x.club/z8u9xmv7 (John King Esq. but try giving it to an LLM)
I will also happily again admit a bit of goal post moving on my part. I was probably a little to harsh on it (maybe because I'm used to her and her history geeks talking about how they don't work well for their research).