Comment by fn-mote

The article is a 2024 "review" (really more of a very brief summary) of a 2002 book about debugging.

The list is fun for us to look at because it is so familiar. The enticement to read the book is the stories it contains. Plus the hope that it will make our juniors more capable of handling complex situations that require meticulous care...

The discussion on the article looks nice but the submitted title breaks the HN rule about numbering (IMO). It's a catchy take on the post anyway. I doubt I would have looked at a more mundane title.