← Back to context Comment by KerrAvon 6 days ago [flagged] 8 comments KerrAvon Reply bpt3 6 days ago If that were a remotely accurate definition of how it is commonly used, you'd have a point. Instead we can see you're part of the problem. calinet6 5 days ago It's an extremely accurate definition of what we genuinely believe. There is no ulterior motive. There is no hidden agenda. It's very simple, and we're all confused why it even needs to be a 'thing.' zahlman 5 days ago >It's an extremely accurate definition of what we genuinely believe.Then why do "you" constantly call me racist, despite me believing it? bpt3 5 days ago The "we" you mention must be an extremely small portion of society then.What percentage of Americans disagree with that definition of woke in your opinion (or with data if you have it)? 2 replies → amanaplanacanal 6 days ago Could you describe how you see it commonly used? I'm unsure what you mean here. bpt3 5 days ago See the article we're discussing.
bpt3 6 days ago If that were a remotely accurate definition of how it is commonly used, you'd have a point. Instead we can see you're part of the problem. calinet6 5 days ago It's an extremely accurate definition of what we genuinely believe. There is no ulterior motive. There is no hidden agenda. It's very simple, and we're all confused why it even needs to be a 'thing.' zahlman 5 days ago >It's an extremely accurate definition of what we genuinely believe.Then why do "you" constantly call me racist, despite me believing it? bpt3 5 days ago The "we" you mention must be an extremely small portion of society then.What percentage of Americans disagree with that definition of woke in your opinion (or with data if you have it)? 2 replies → amanaplanacanal 6 days ago Could you describe how you see it commonly used? I'm unsure what you mean here. bpt3 5 days ago See the article we're discussing.
calinet6 5 days ago It's an extremely accurate definition of what we genuinely believe. There is no ulterior motive. There is no hidden agenda. It's very simple, and we're all confused why it even needs to be a 'thing.' zahlman 5 days ago >It's an extremely accurate definition of what we genuinely believe.Then why do "you" constantly call me racist, despite me believing it? bpt3 5 days ago The "we" you mention must be an extremely small portion of society then.What percentage of Americans disagree with that definition of woke in your opinion (or with data if you have it)? 2 replies →
zahlman 5 days ago >It's an extremely accurate definition of what we genuinely believe.Then why do "you" constantly call me racist, despite me believing it?
bpt3 5 days ago The "we" you mention must be an extremely small portion of society then.What percentage of Americans disagree with that definition of woke in your opinion (or with data if you have it)? 2 replies →
amanaplanacanal 6 days ago Could you describe how you see it commonly used? I'm unsure what you mean here. bpt3 5 days ago See the article we're discussing.
If that were a remotely accurate definition of how it is commonly used, you'd have a point. Instead we can see you're part of the problem.
It's an extremely accurate definition of what we genuinely believe. There is no ulterior motive. There is no hidden agenda. It's very simple, and we're all confused why it even needs to be a 'thing.'
>It's an extremely accurate definition of what we genuinely believe.
Then why do "you" constantly call me racist, despite me believing it?
The "we" you mention must be an extremely small portion of society then.
What percentage of Americans disagree with that definition of woke in your opinion (or with data if you have it)?
2 replies →
Could you describe how you see it commonly used? I'm unsure what you mean here.
See the article we're discussing.