And of course I'd make the same argument for Andrew Tate. Budweiser hiring Tate isn't "promoting his ideology". Because Budweiser has no ideology beyond "we think this makes us money". They chose Dylan because they thought "this makes us money", if they chose Tate it would be because they thought it makes them money. In neither case would they be promoting their actors ideologies. They are a boring mega corp, their one ideology is "sell beer".
Does that apply to every actor bud hires? If that actor says something personal on their feed, bud is promoting their ideology?
Tom Cruise did ads for bud, is Budweiser promoting Scientology?
If not, walk me through why one is promoting ideology and the other isn't.
[flagged]
You are avoiding the question.
And of course I'd make the same argument for Andrew Tate. Budweiser hiring Tate isn't "promoting his ideology". Because Budweiser has no ideology beyond "we think this makes us money". They chose Dylan because they thought "this makes us money", if they chose Tate it would be because they thought it makes them money. In neither case would they be promoting their actors ideologies. They are a boring mega corp, their one ideology is "sell beer".