← Back to context

Comment by BrenBarn

3 days ago

Don't hold your breath for the next step where they pass laws criminalizing any attempt to find or use such loopholes, so cops can be jailed for trying to use civil asset forfeiture in any way.

> laws criminalizing any attempt to find or use such loopholes

Loopholes aren’t illegal, they’re a problem with the law. Using the law to criminalise loopholes is Kafkaesque.

  • In some sense a large amount of law is closing loopholes in earlier law. You're right that my wording was a bit loose, but what I'm saying is Nevada could pass a state law saying "Any attempt by law enforcement to carry out civil asset forfeiture in any way is a felony."

    • > Nevada could pass a state law saying "Any attempt by law enforcement to carry out civil asset forfeiture in any way is a felony.”

      Given felonies require prosecution, this gives prosecutors draconian enforcement powers over police. Maybe that’s okay. I suspect it would facilitate corruption.

      Better: remove qualified immunity for asset forfeitures.

      5 replies →

    • That would make legitimate civil asset forfeiture impossible to execute.

      Better, I think, would be to pass a law that says "civil asset forfeiture is no longer a thing." The problem then would be "so what do we do with property that should be seized by the state?"

      The fire department gets called to an exploded meth lab containing a few dead bodies and a safe containing $200,000. What do?

      16 replies →

    • >"Any attempt by law enforcement to carry out civil asset forfeiture in any way is a felony."

      Civil asset forfeiture means a lot more than what you think it does.

      Do you remember a story a couple of years ago about a couple who foreclosed on a local Bank of America branch after Bank of America wrongfully started foreclosure proceedings on their home? That's civil asset forfeiture.

      The sheriff's deputies who went with them to enforce the foreclosure are not criminals.

      If you are a freelancer and your client doesn't pay you and you get a court order to collect what you are owed: civil asset forfeiture.

      A clerk filing the paperwork to get you your money is not a criminal.

      Even the ACLU is fighting civil asset forfeiture ABUSE because as actual lawyers they understand what it means.

      https://www.aclu.org/news/by-issue/asset-forfeiture-abuse

      2 replies →

My preference is 100% of fines and siezed property should go to the Social Security Administration.

Bonus diverting money or property would be a federal crime.