← Back to context

Comment by PaulDavisThe1st

2 days ago

Possibly consider that "deleting a file from history" is rather far outside the norm or recommended practice for git (even though it is, of course, entirely possible)

> even though it is, of course, entirely possible

I take the more realistic perspective: until git makes it impossible to commit something that shouldn't have been, like a secret, then deleting a file from history is a fundamental requirement of git.

  • Even if you purge the history, the secret is compromised and you should stop using it. It's moot whether or not you're able to remove it from history.

    • That's, for secrets. Secrets aren't the only thing one might want to remove retroactively.

  • The designers of git clearly disagreed, as you can guess from its design, so it's not surprising it might feel like a bit of an uphill struggle (and will probably remain so). There are other tools available.