Comment by michaelmrose
3 months ago
No because it was medical as well. Anyone who thought it was purely statistical was by that thought alone unqualified
3 months ago
No because it was medical as well. Anyone who thought it was purely statistical was by that thought alone unqualified
What's the medical part of the argument?
Are we getting stuck on terminology whereby you don't think the long term effect of a chemical on a body insofar as its connection with a known disease is a medical matter?
Medicine is literally chemistry and biology as applied to human health. I'm not stuck on anything you in this subthread appear to be. It's pretty obvious that someone without deep domain knowledge is should scarcely be trusted to tie their own shoe let alone contradict actual experts.