← Back to context

Comment by permo-w

2 days ago

this is like saying that regulating automatic weapons is misguided because someone might invent a gun that is equally dangerous without being automatic

This appears to be a very shallow take and lazy argument that does not capture even basic nuance of the issue at hand. For the sake of expanding it a little and hopefully moving it in the right direction, I will point out that BIS framework discusses use of advanced models as dual use goods ( ie. not automatically automatic weapons ).

edit(removed exasparated sigh; it does not add anything )